David Nelson , MD  
            Private Practice, San Francisco 
            Webmaster, eRadius 
            Associate Editor, J Hand Surgery 
            Director, San Francisco Bay Area Hand Club | 
            | 
         
       
      There were two issues. 
      The first issue is the size of the gap. The radiologist 
        was hesitant to state a size of the gap and claimed that he had no basis 
        for measuring the gap. He stated that the manufacturer did not claim any 
        specific level of accuracy of the scans, there were no phantoms that could 
        indicate the accuracy of the scans, and that he had no experimental basis 
        for claiming any accuracy of the scans. (So much for relying on radiologists!) 
       
      
      It appeared that the gap was probably on the order of 3 to 4 mm in size, 
        based on the two selected views, above left. The image on the far right 
        is through the ulnar cortex of the radius and probably represents a tangential 
        view of the gap, and therefore overrepresents the true gap size. The dorsal 
        fragment probably is at risk of further subsidence.  
      The angles on the plane films, both PA and lateral, as well as the radial 
        length, are normal. There are no stepoffs seen in any views, either plain 
        films or CT.  
      The gap size and risk of subsidence of the dorsal fragment, which would 
        further increase the size of the gap, suggested that ORIF was appropriate. 
      The second issue was the patient's desire to return 
        to work as soon as possible. She did not feel she could do her job in 
        a cast. She asked about other options. One option would be an ORIF with 
        a fixed angle volar plate, which would allow splinting for comfort for 
        three days and then no immobilization at all. Light use of the arm would 
        start as soon as pain would allow. Moderately forceful use would be allowed 
        in three months and unlimited forceful use or traumatic use (contact sports) 
        would be allowed in four months.  
       
      (7) What are your indications for surgery based on the size of the gap and 
      stepoff? What would you recommend for treatment, based solely on the 
      fracture configuration and gap size, and irrespective of her desire to return 
      to work? 
      (8) Is there any indication for ORIF based on her desire to return to 
        work early? Has the advent of the fixed angle volar plates changed your 
        treatment of fractures that otherwise could be well treated in just a 
        case? Does it vary by age?  
      (9) What would you recommend for treatment for this woman?  
        
      The case continues on the next page >>> 
      Jump to Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  
     | 
      |