|
Demineralized Bone Matrix (Allografts) | |||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
Product |
Company |
Nature of Material |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Cost (11/98) |
||||||
Grafton DBM | Osteotech/Am. Red Cross | demineralized allograft |
disease transmission |
$300/2.5 cc $546/5.0 cc |
|||||||
Dynagraft | DePuy/GenSci Regeneration | demineralized allograft |
disease transmission |
putty: $225/2.5 cc $415/5.0 cc gel: $395/5.0 cc matrix: $205/2x2 cm |
|||||||
AlloGro | AlloSource | demineralized allograft |
disease transmission |
not known |
|||||||
Opteform | Exactech | demineralized allograft | the carrier for this product is formable in warm water but solid at body temperature |
disease transmission |
not known |
||||||
Note: These products have not been approved by the FDA, since human-derived materials are not covered by the FDA legislative mandate. They are regulated the way blood for transfusion is regulated, and is quite different. | |||||||||||
Mineral | |||||||||||
This group of products contain materials that are similar to the mineral phase of bone and are osetoconductive. They are not osteoinductive. | |||||||||||
Product |
Company |
Nature of Material |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Cost (11/98) |
||||||
Interpore Int'l | coraline hydroxyapetite |
some structural strength remodels faster than the original 500 (500R has less of the calcium carbonate changed into calcium phosphate) |
block: $160/1.0 cc $319/2.4 cc $512/4.0cc $986/10.0cc granules: $211/5.0 cc $390/10.0cc $5575/20cc |
||||||||
OsteoSet | Wright Biomedical | highly purified plaster of paris | very fast remodelling very rapid bone formation | no structural strength |
$225/5.0 cc $320/10.0cc $510/20cc $1280/50cc |
||||||
Stimulan | Encore Orthopedics | calcium sulfate bone void filler, medical grade calcium sulfate dihydrate and stearic acid | no data yet | no data yet | no data yet | ||||||
Mineral Cements | |||||||||||
Product |
Company |
Nature of Material |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Cost (11/98) |
||||||
SRS | Norian | carbonated apetite |
first on the market supplements internal fixation will be available very soon; cleared by FDA |
collapses without supplementary support |
not priced as of 1/15/99 in USA |
||||||
BoneSource | Stryker/Howmedica | carbonated apetite |
not yet available probably more similar to Norian SRS than to anything else |
not sufficient data released in Europe |
not priced as of 1/15/99 in USA |
||||||
alpha-BSM | Etex | carbonated apetite |
not yet available resorbs much faster than Norian SRS |
not sufficient data released in Europe |
not priced as of 1/15/99 in USA |
||||||
Mineral & Other Components | |||||||||||
Product |
Company |
Nature of Material |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Cost (11/98) |
||||||
Collagraft | Zimmer | ultrapurified bovine collagen + tricalcium phosphate + hydroxyapetite | easily mixes with host bone | no structural strength |
$241/1strip $593/3strips $991/6strips |
||||||
Healos | Orquest |
collagen + hydroxyapetite porous sponge- |
in early development |
not yet priced |
|||||||
Mineral &/Or Cytokines* | |||||||||||
Product |
Company |
Nature of Material |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Cost (11/98) |
||||||
rh-BMP-2 | SofamoreDanek/ Genetics Institute | recombinant human BMP-2 | in early development | ||||||||
Novos | Stryker/Creative Biomolecules | bovine collagen + OP-1 (BMP-7) | in early development | ||||||||
Ossigel | Orquest | bFGF in hyaluronic acid | in early development | ||||||||
Matrix Inductor | IsoTis BV | in early development | |||||||||
TGF-beta-1 | DePuy/Genetech | TGF-beta-1 | in early development | ||||||||
Ne-Osteo | Sulzer Orthopedics Biologics | in early development | |||||||||
Other (Do not fit into above categories) |
|||||
Product |
Company |
Nature of Material |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
Cost (11/98) |
Immix | OsteoBiologics | PLA/PGA | material is quite new, no data yet available |
unknown |
|
The field of bone graft substitutes is changing rapidly, even more rapidly than a Website can keep up with. Letters have been sent to the various manufacturers requesting that updates be sent to the Webmaster, and will be incorporated as quickly as possible into this section. The various advantages and disadvantages listed are quite relative to the intended use. For example, in bone grafting the spine, the fact that there is no structural strength is not a disadvantage, while it might be in grafting a distal radial fracture. The purpose of this section is to draw information from many sources and present it in one place in a uniform format, so that the individual surgeon can start to make informed choices. Obviously, much has been omitted in order to fit this table; the surgeon is advised to learn more about each material before using it.
We expect to soon have a Discussion Group capability added to the site, which will allow surgeons to discuss their experience. This should be a great help to surgeons in some countries, if the product has extensive exposure in other countries.
About Us | Research | Basic Knowledge | What's New | Forum | Guest Professor | Post a Case | eRadius Conference | Patients | Home |