Comparison of Autograft
with Other Materials
Table prepared
by David L. Nelson, MD
Last updated: 11/21/99
Terms:
Osteoinduction: induces
the formation of new bone by means of cytokines, such as BMP,
which are proteins that influence adjacent cells to transform
into osteoblasts.
Osteoconduction: provides
a scaffold for the cells to move into the area and create new
bone.
Osteogenesis: living cells
which are or transform into osteoblasts and create new bone.
Material |
Examples |
Advantage |
Disadvantage |
autograft bone
|
- cortical,
- cancellous
- corticocancellous
|
- no autoimmune incompatibility
- best for osteoinduction,
osteoconduction and osteogenesis
- possibly decreased cost
|
- donor site morbidity
- increased operative time
- possibly increased cost
|
allograft bone |
- frozen
- freeze dried
- demineralized
|
- no donor site morbidity
- potential for osteoconduction
and/or osteoinduction, varies with processing techniques used
|
- immunogenic
- structurally weaker
- poorer inductive, conductive
properties
- not osteogenic
|
matrix proteins |
|
|
- immunogenic
- no structural properties
- most not osteoconductive
- not osteogenic
|
synthetic substitutes
|
- Interpore ProOsteon (from
coral)
- Wright OsteoSet
|
|
- variable strength
- remodeled poorly
- not osteoinductive
- not osteogenic
|
|
- Norian SRS
- Stryker/Howmedica BoneSource
- Etex a BSM
|
- some structructural strength
- Norian is currently available
in US but has only a limited release; available in Europe; others
available in Europe and elsewhere
|
- not PMMA!
- collapses without support
- not all yet available
in US, but are available in Europe and elsewhere
|
|
|
|
|
- mineral + collagen
+cytokine (bone growth factor)
|
- in development (PMA,
IDE)
|
- osteoconductive
- osteoinductive
|
|
- collagen +cytokine
(bone growth factor)
|
- in development (PMA, IDE)
- (Novos, with OP-1)
|
- osteoconductive
- osteoinductive
|
|
|
All of the above would be osteogenic
when mixed with bone graft, but not all can be
|
|